【程元敏】〈國甜心一包養網風〉私交詩宋人說討原
requestId:684c3e123c0965.20372081.
〈国大〉〉The Song Dynasty’s Discussion Original
Author: Cheng Yuanmin
Source: Volume 4, Issue 2, “Chinese and Foreign Literature”, July 14, 2020, People’s Republic of China
Time: Confucius was in the 2570s and the 21st day of the mid-spring of the Gengzi
� According to this, many scholars and scholars from Han Wei and Tang dynasties have identified the title of the article. In the Song Dynasty, there were even more people who discussed it. As for Chang Yan’s chapter on dismissing lust, 彩彩. In the past, Yu wrote “The Life and Art of Wang Bai” and the editor of the Wu Dynasty reviewed this matter. However, this article specifically says that Wang’s “Pen” is studied, and it is bound to the physical examples, and cannot be thorough and systematic. The information collected is not convenient to be fully understood. The old writing cursive script has been completed so far that it suddenly became four years old. The old ones are new, and the relevant information is getting more and more abundant. After ten days of rest, Dong Li finally made this chapter, and there were several chapters to teach the students.
1. Baohua.com Problems
The Psychics “The Psychics” are 160 articles, including many romantic poems between men and women. Wang Bai (No. Lu Qiong) from the Song Dynasty led the thirty chapters (or twenty-nine chapters), thinking that they were all lustful. Since the death of Wang (10th year of Xianchun in the Song Dynasty, 1274 AD), this incident has affected the subjects of the school’s education base and subject; as for those who write articles and essayists, it is particularly difficult to deal with it. This is a big event in the history of academics. In the past, most of the blame was Wang Bai, and the deepest responsibility and the most serious consideration were nothing more than the [Qing Dynasty] Bian Yun and Pi Sirui. Pi’s “General Review of the Study” (Volume 2) “There are eight difficult people to understand the difficulty of “Pen” than him”, saying:
The people of the Song Dynasty were suspicious, and they became rampant when they reached Wang Bai, and they were arrogant and reckless in “The Style of the Country” and retreated to Confucius.
Huang Zhuo made a photocopy of Hanfen’s book “Comprehensive Study” by Hanfen’s house
Pi made this speech, which actually simulated the scriptures. “The Summary of the Four Library Complete Books” (Volume 17) was in the “Personal Class I” and “The Second Volume of the “Personal Class I”” and pointed out that Wang’s poems were given:
Who is Bai! Dare to break the blame and retreat to Confucius! …ResultsThen he said that the bai sect master He Ji, the keen master Huang Jing, and the keen master Zhu Zi were no more than three times apart, so he dared not to disagree with this book. This is the opinion of the door and not the public opinion of the whole country.
“Four Cubes of Essentials” (Volume 13 (公司Baobao.com‘s “The Book of Contents 1” “Nine Volumes of the Book of Questions”) and is responsible for the author of the “History of the Song Dynasty” and should not be entitled for Wang Bai; even privately compiled history to be entitled for Wang’s family, but Jian Yun was not satisfied. “Four Custody Essences” (Volume 58) commented on “The Three Encyclopedias of Historical Episodes” by Zhu Zhu’s “Three Encyclopedias of Historical Episodes” and said:
Wang Bai was domineering and unrestrained, and even changed Confucius’ holy book, all of which were listed, as if he was a Shaofeng!
There are tens of dozens of people who criticize Wang Bai in “Suoyao” and “The Collection of Wenda Gong”. Once an important official of the dynasty, he did not hesitate to focus on attacking the king of Ruyi in the area, hoping that his important goals were two: one was based on the court’s establishment (the “Four Books of Four Library” was originally an official book), to maintain the completeness of the sage’s books; the other was to reflect the style of learning at that time (Kan and Jiaqi periods) and oppose Song Dynasty. Zhu Zi was the master of Song Dynasty, and if he wanted to attack Song Dynasty, he would not succeed. However, in the early Qing Dynasty, Zhu Xue was highly respected by the authorities (the imperial compilation of “The Book of Changes” compiled by Kangxi, the “Book of Changes” compiled by Yongzheng, and the “Book of Changes” compiled by the Poetry and the “Book of Changes” compiled by the Poetry and the “Book of Changes” compiled by the Poetry and the “Book of Changes” compiled by the People’s Republic of China, and the “Book of Changes” compiled by the People’s Republic of China, were both mainly Zhu Xue Xue.); he was very strong in the common people. He did not make it easy to directly attack Zhu Zi, so he gathered arrows at Wang Bai, and as Fang Dongshu said in “Hanxue Shangyu”, “The dance drama is in full swing, and the ambition is in Pei Gong” (Note 1).
It is pointed out that there is lust in “Guofeng”, which does not begin with Zhu Xi and Wang Bai of the Southern Song Dynasty. The Northern Song Dynasty scholars have clearly stated that the “Guofeng” chapter contains lustful works; it is not the most senior teacher of the Northern Song Dynasty. The Han and Tang people have discussed the “Guofeng” chapter of “Guofeng”; not only the Han and Tang people, but also the pre-Qin classics have never said that “Guofeng” is lustful and lustful. If you have abandoned the “Penchant of the Book of the Book of the Later generations, you will directly seek the poem, and the “Penchant of the People” is probably more than the number of comments in the past.
Controversy between the descendants of the Tang Dynasty
1. The words of pre-Qin scholars
The 305 articles of “Pen Sheng” are about 40,000, with only the word “lewdness”. The “Zhou” “Youke” chapter: “As long as there is tyrant power, it will bring blessings to Confucius and Yi.” “lewdness” is the meaning of “bigness”, and the meaning of tyranny is great virtue; it has nothing to do with lust and lust. “Guofeng” does not contain the word “lust”, but there is indeed lust, such as “Zhen Feng” and “Zhu Lin” chapter: “Hu is Zhulin, from Xia Nan. It is not suitable for Zhulin, from Xia Nan.” Chen Linggong was lustful and Xia Zhengshu’s name is the mother of Zinan (“Xing Dynasty Commentary of the Song Mao Family” by Chen You, the Qing Dynasty). His poems have clear texts, and the story follows the “Zuo” “Zhu” “Ninth and Tenth Years of Xuan” “Zhu”. But he still said that he was a priest from the Preface of the Psalm; and the whole poem will be full of poems.The chapter is very elegant, and it looks very similar to the voice of the beholder. But the chapter “Ying Feng” and “Mangzhong” is not based on the song, and the first chapter of the chapter:
I have been recruiting the Tang Dynasty and have been responsible for the country. Whose thoughts? Beautiful Meng Jiang. I hope I will go to the mulberry tree, I will go to the palace, and I will go to the top of Qi.
The poem uses the three words “I” (the same as chapters 2 and 3), which clearly shows the poem about a man and a woman having a private meeting. The “Preface” says “Still the Bo”, and the poem text does not have this meaning in all. “National Style” contains about 17 poems about men and women whose pronoun “I, I” appear about 63 times.
In this type of poem, pre-Qin scholars judged it as a lewd poem. In the second chapter of “The Silent Girl” chapter “The Silent Girl is a pampering my slut; the Tong Guan has a slut, and it says that the beauty of the girl is.” “The Ninth Year of Dinggong” said: “The third chapter of “The Silent Girl” is taken.” The author of “The Silent Girl” believes that “The Silent Girl” is a private relationship between men and women, and only the “Tong Guan” chapter of the chapter is “the red Guan is the author of “the historical record of the female history” and can be regarded as “the red Guan is the author of the female history record”. In the second year of Chenggong, the “Zuo Ji” Ming verdict of “Ying Feng” and “Sang Zhong” was a chapter of “Ying Feng” and “Sang Zhong” and said: “
Wu
